In cases of IIED, there does not need to be bodily harm for a plaintiff to recover damages. Behavior that a reasonable person would consider rude or obnoxious doesn’t meet the definition. New York courts, as well as courts in other states, have often been reluctant to allow recovery for negligent infliction of emotional distress ("NIED"). Finally, regarding the November 3rd article, Plaintiff identified one statement: In order to be relieved from the requirement of pleading special damages in a defamation action, Plaintiff must allege that the challenged statements were defamatory per se. A Long Island car accident attorney can discuss the details of your case and help determine if you should file a claim for emotional distress. Thereafter, on August 19, 2018, Plaintiff moved for default judgment against the FLT Defendants pursuant to CPLR 3215. ESX-L-1947-13, December 22, 2015: To maintain a cause of action for Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress (NIED), a plaintiff must demonstrate that a defendant was negligent, that the defendant’s negligence was the proximate cause of emotional harm to the plaintiff, and that the defendant owed a duty to the plaintiff. Commentary . Plaintiff has moved for default judgment pursuant to CPLR 3215 against the FLT Defendants. FingerLakes1.com, reported the notice of claim in an article published on its website on September 11, 2017. These cases tend to find more success because they often come alongside other damages, such as a physical injury or a hefty vehicle repair bill. Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress Claim Failed Addressing Inskeep’s negligent infliction of emotional distress claim, the Court agreed with the trial court that Inskeep’s claim failed because he did not allege that he witnessed or experienced a dangerous accident or was subjected to an actual physical peril, as required under the law. Here’s how it differs from simply being upset: When your attorney can prove that all of the above elements are present, the person or party that caused your distress is held liable in court. The first sentence of the statement indicates that it is an opinion and opinion statements are not actionable defamation (Boulos v Newman, 302 AD2d 932, 933 [4th Dept 2003]). Plaintiffs asserting claims for negligent infliction of emotional distress must establish that they were owed a duty by a defendant, that such duty was breached and, because of the breach, they were exposed to an unreasonable risk of bodily injury or death. Jayson Lutzky handles personal injury cases in the Greater New York City Area. CPLR 3211(a) (1) allows a motion to dismiss a cause of action on the basis that a defense is founded on documentary evidence. By affidavit of service, Plaintiff states that both the Finger Lakes Times and David Shaw were served with the summons and complaint on March 28, 2018. Ctr., 58 NY2d 1053, 1055 [1983]). In many cases, you will file for compensation for negligent infliction of emotional distress after a New York car accident. The reason for the requirement of specific pleading in defamation cases is to give adequate notice to the defendant as to the occurrence constituting the wrong and to discourage the institution of vexatious actions" (Pappalardo v. Westchester Rockland Newspapers, Inc., 101 AD2d 830, 830 [2d Dept 1984], aff'd, 64 NY2d 862 [1985]). By Dr. S. Y. Tan . On the other hand, negligent infliction of emotional distress occurs in conjunction with bodily harm, such as in a wreck. Co, 87 NY2d 308, 316 [1995]). Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress The state law tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress has four elements:   (1) extreme and outrageous conduct, (2) intent to cause severe emotional distress, (3) a causal connection between the conduct and the injury, and (4) severe emotional distress. When you have been involved in a car accident, it’s important to remember that you have the right to seek compensation in a court of law. CPLR § 3016[a] requires that in "an action for libel or slander, the particular words complained of shall be set forth in the complaint. The carelessness will typically put you in fear of physical injury or have caused actual physical injury to a family member. Plaintiff specifies one statement in the October 2nd article: The Plaintiff has failed to specify any statement within the October 11th article and, therefore, fails to plead a cause of action for defamation regarding the October 11, 2017 article. In addition, as the Fourth Department has held that a cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress must be "premised on conduct that unreasonably endangers the plaintiff's physical safety or causes the plaintiff to fear for his or her physical safety" (Passucci v Home Depot, Inc., 67 AD3d 1470, 1471 [4th Dept 2009]). The FingerLakes1.com article did not reference Plaintiff by name and Plaintiff's name was redacted from a photo of Porsch's notice of claim. Contact us online to schedule your initial case evaluation today. Doyle, J. A plaintiff must establish three elements: v Zahran, 100 AD3d 1549, 1550 [4th Dept 2012]). Therefore, Plaintiff has not established her entitlement to a default judgment under CPLR 3215 and her motion for default [*3]judgment is denied.[FN1]. This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Plaintiff's default judgment motion is supported by affidavits of service of the original summons and complaint, but not with affidavits of services of the amended summons and complaint. To determine whether the publication is reasonably susceptible to plaintiff's interpretation, a court must construe the statements "in their general understanding and ordinary meaning as perceived by the average reader" (Obi v Amoa, 58 Misc 3d 446, 451 [Sup Ct 2017] (emphasis added)). The Plaintiff's sixth cause of action alleges that Plaintiff has been retaliated against by Defendant Porsch's notice of claim for being a '"Whistleblower.'" Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. There need not be bodily harm to establish this tort. Contact Website Profile. Your case could be eligible for recovery of emotional distress damages if the following applies. Although controversial and not accepted in many U.S. jurisdictions, the New York State code does acknowledge it as a legitimate tort and stipulates a … In order to succeed on a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1), the documentary evidence that forms the basis of the defense must resolve all factual issues as a matter of law and conclusively dispose of the Plaintiff's claim (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. For a statement to injure a plaintiff in her trade, business, or profession it"must be more than a general reflection upon [Plaintiff's] character or qualities" and instead, "must reflect on [Plaintiff's] performance or be incompatible with the proper conduct of her business" Golub v. Enquirer/Star Grp., Inc., 89 NY2d 1074, 1076 (1997]). No. IIED occurs when a person, through extreme or outrageous behavior intentionally (or recklessly) causes severe emotional distress, mental trauma and/or bodily harm to another. "Negligent infliction of emotional distress" (NEID) is a personal injury law concept that arises when one person (the defendant) acts so carelessly that he or she must compensate the injured person (the plaintiff) for resulting mental or emotional injury. He said his goal by filing the notice of claim is to correct an ongoing problem his office has with this person, who said is attempting to influence the way cases in Seneca County are prosecuted." Plaintiff commenced this action by electronic filing in the NYSCEF system of a summons and complaint on March 21, 2018 and filed an amended summons and complaint on April 10, 2018. On September 14, 2017, in a story written by Defendant David L. Shaw and published by Defendants Finger Lakes Times and Finger Lakes Publishing Inc. (Collectively, "The FLT Defendants") posted an article online discussing the notice of claim filed by Defendant Porsch. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. As the statute of limitations period for a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress is three years (CPLR 214), the allegations in the complaint that were outside the one-year statute of limitations period for the intentional infliction of emotional distress could be considered for the purposes of negligent infliction of emotional distress. What are the elements of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress? Infliction of Mental Suffering: A New Tort, 37 MICH. L. REV. However, what the plaintiff could do was try to prove that he had suffered actual physical harm and that, as a result of the physical harm, he had also suffered emotional distress. Visit Website 646-828-7216 Contact Us. negligent infliction of emotional distress as an independent tort.2 While the Schultz decision was in accord with new trends in the law and advancements in medical science, it left the administration of this new tort undefined. Under the traditional view, there was no duty regarding the negligent infliction of emotional distress.. "One who by extreme and outrageous conduct intentionally or recklessly causes severe emotional distress to another is subject to liability for such emo- The conduct was intentional or reckless and caused; Severe emotional distress and, in some cases, bodily harm. 3.The FLT Defendants' motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 or, in the alternative, for leave to file a late answer. [*2]The September 14th article did not identify the Plaintiff by name or by other identifying information . Your adrenaline spikes amid the wreck, sending your body into fight or flight mode. As the statute of limitations period for a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress is three years (CPLR 214), the allegations in the complaint that were outside the one-year statute of limitations period for the intentional infliction of emotional distress could be considered for the purposes of negligent infliction of emotional distress. Publishers, Inc., 180 Misc 2d 658, 660 [Sup Ct 1999] (reporting on an FBI report was not defamatory as FBI investigation was an official proceeding)). Supreme Court, Seneca County Finally, on November 3, 2017, in a story about the race for County district attorney, the FLT Defendants again quoted Defendant Porsch discussing the notices of claims filed by Defendant Porsch and Plaintiff. In determining a motion to dismiss under CPLR 3211[a][7], The Fourth Department has held that the Court may consider under CPLR 3211[c] evidentiary material submitted on a motion to dismiss for the limited purpose of assessing the facial sufficiency of a complaint, but may only grant dismissal if the evidentiary material establishes "conclusively that plaintiff has no cause of action" (Liberty Affordable Hous., Inc. v Maple Ct. Apartments, 125 AD3d 85, 89 [4th Dept 2015] (emphasis in the original)). To state a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress ("IIED"), a plaintiff must allege "(1) extreme and outrageous conduct, (2) intent to cause severe emotional distress, (3) a causal connection between the conduct and the injury, and (4) severe emotional distress." These cases tend to find more success because they often come alongside other damages, such as a physical injury or a hefty vehicle repair bill. The Plaintiff's complaint is devoid of any allegation that the Defendants engaged in conduct that unreasonably endangered the Plaintiff's physical safety or caused her to fear for her safety. The filing of the amended summons and complaint on the NYSCEF system does not constitute service upon the FLT Defendants under 22 NYCRR § 202.5-b as the FLT Defendants had not yet consented to NYSCEF e-filing. 10. At first, an emotional distress claim could be successful only if the mental injury was connected to the infliction of physical harm. The notice of claim procedure is an official proceeding prescribed by law with its own procedures which include: (1) the filing of a notice of claim (GML § 50-e); (2) that the notice of claim be recorded (GML § 50-f); that the claimant submit to an examination under oath and that testimony may be used in an action upon which the claim was made (GML § 50-h); and (4) that as a result of that examination, the municipality may adjust the claim to the satisfaction of the claimant (GML § 50-i). Porsch's notice of claim purports to place the County on notice of potential claims for libel, slander, and defamation of character. ORDERED that the Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is DENIED in its entirety; and it is further, ORDERED that the motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211[a][7] of Defendant Barry Porsch is GRANTED in its entirety; and it is further, ORDERED that the motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211[a]1] and CPLR 3211[a]7] of Defendants David L. Shaw, The Finger Lakes Times, and Finger Lakes Publishing, Inc., is GRANTED in its entirety; and it is further. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress. 2019 NY Slip Op 50369(U) In applying Fischer, the Fourth Department has observed that a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress is duplicative of a claim for defamation and subject to dismissal, holding: In her first cause of action, Plaintiff alleges what appears to be a claim for the negligent infliction of emotional distress. Negligent cause of emotional distress. This does not apply when the distress is a direct result of a physical injury. 646-828-7216. It may also involve a pattern of behavior that causes the victim to be fearful and to have altered their lifestyle against their personal interests to cope. In many cases, you will file for compensation for negligent infliction of emotional distress after a New York car accident. Finally, the negligent infliction of emotional distress must be based upon negligent conduct — or, put another way, conduct that is intentional in nature will not support a cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress (Santana v Leith, 117 AD3d 711, 712 [2d Dept 2014]). When someone behaves in this manner, and the negative impacts can be demonstrated, they can be held liable in court. As a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress arises out of negligence, Plaintiff must allege that the Defendants owed Plaintiff a duty and the breach of that duty owed to the Plaintiff "either unreasonably endangers the plaintiff's physical safety, or causes the plaintiff to fear for his or her own safety". If you have been subjected to harassing and negligent behaviors that caused you emotional distress, then contact a New York personal injury attorney who can advise you on the best way to proceed in seeking justice. New September 2003; Revised June 2014, December 2014. In order to support a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress, Plaintiff was also required to allege conduct that is "so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community" Murphy v Am. On or about September 8, 2017, Defendant Porsch, the Seneca County District Attorney, served a Notice of Claim on Seneca County (the "County") and a Seneca County employee, Plaintiff Rickerson, who is a Seneca County Probation Officer Assistant. Civil Rights § 74 states that: While reporting on a notice of claim may best be understood as reporting on a judicial proceeding, Civil Rights § 74 is broader than just judicial proceedings, as it includes any "other official proceeding." Thus, while the Plaintiff established valid service of process, she did not establish a default in pleading. Though Plaintiff was free to amend her complaint as of right (see CPLR 3025[a]), the filing of an amended summons and complaint superseded the original complaint (St. Lawrence Explosives Corp. v Law Bros. Contr. Section 4, Inc. v Bezvoleva, 161 AD3d 916, 917 [2d Dept 2018] quoting Gross v New York Times Co., 82 NY2d 146, 153 [1993]). Lawyer Media, Inc., 300 AD2d 215, 216 [1st Dept 2002]). On October 11, 2017, the FLT Defendants reported on the fact that the County had hired a law firm to handle the notices of claim filed by Plaintiff and Defendant Porsch. 222 (1939). That analysis would not include any allegations regarding defamation since negligent infliction of emotional distress, like intentional [*8]infliction of emotional distress discussed above, would b e redundant to a claim for defamation (see Misek-Falkoff v Am. Intentional infliction of emotional distress is when a party acts purposely upon another to cause a heightened state of negative emotion. Nowhere in any of the articles complained of by the Plaintiff does there appear a statement that would rise to the level of defamation per se. In its most recent discussion of negligent infliction of emotional distress, the Court of Appeals stated: "[a] breach of the duty of care resulting directly in emotional harm is compensable even though no physical injury occurred when the mental injury is a direct, rather than a consequential, result of the breach and when the claim possesses some guarantee of genuineness" (Ornstein v New York City … As an initial matter the FLT Defendants were not responsible for its publication, and, as a result, the essential element of publication is missing against the FLT Defendants. & Loan Assn. Now that you understand what does not count as emotional distress, let’s take a look at the two kinds of emotional distress recognized by New York civil courts: Intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligent infliction of emotional distress. Rickerson v Porsch On a motion made pursuant to CPLR 3211[a][7], the Court must "accept the facts as alleged in the complaint as true, accord plaintiffs the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory" (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87—88 [1994]). This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. Therefore, even if proceedings on notice of claims are not "judicial proceedings," they are undoubtedly official proceedings and Civil Rights Law § 74 is still applicable (see, e.g. from the negligence of another. A statement is defamatory per se only where the alleged statement (1) accuses the plaintiff of a serious crime, (2) claims the plaintiff has a loathsome disease, or (3) tends to injure the plaintiff in her trade, business, or profession Liberman v Gelstein, 80 NY2d 429, 435 [1992]). Home Products Corp., 58 NY2d 293, 303 [1983]). To recover for negligent infliction of emotional distress, the injured party must prove, among other things, " ‘extreme and outrageous conduct' [on the part of defendant]" and that he or she suffered "severe emotional distress" (Howell v New York Post Co., 81 NY2d 115, 121). This reluctance stems primarily from public policy concerns. Taking this cause of action to assert a claim for negligence, Defendant Porsch argues that Plaintiff failed to state a cause of action. The exact definition of severe emotional distress is vague, and plaintiffs must prove to a jury that the emotional distress they experienced reached a sufficient level of severity to justify an award for intentional infliction. Question: Mary visited her twin sister, Cecilia, in the hospital where she had recently undergone brain surgery. The tort of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, commonly abbreviated as IIED, is a relatively new one, as courts only recently have begun to recognize that compensation is necessary for victims in these situations. Because bodily harm is not necessarily present in instances of IIED, it is harder to prove—but an experienced personal injury attorney can … Intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED; sometimes called the tort of outrage) is a common law tort that allows individuals to recover for severe emotional distress caused by another individual who intentionally or recklessly inflicted emotional distress by behaving in an "extreme and outrageous" way. Pending before the Court are the following three motions: 1.Defendant Porsch's motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211. Call our office at (631) 543-7070 to schedule your free, no-obligation consultation with one of our experienced Long Island personal injury attorneys. Plaintiff produced no affidavit of service indicating that she served the amended summons and complaint on the FLT Defendants. In order for a person to be able to file a claim for emotional distress, the behavior of the offending party must exceed the bounds of normal societal decency. If you think about the emotions you go through each day, chances are that you would consider one or more to be distressing. The conduct Plaintiff attributes to Defendant Porsch in 2016 and early 2017 that falls outside the one-year period in which Plaintiff had commenced this action was intentional in nature and cannot support a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress. Prior to the expiration of the FLT Defendants' time to answer the original complaint, Plaintiff filed an amended summons and complaint on April 10, 2018. But courts in many states – including New York – now recognize the right to compensation for emotional distress without physical injury or even physical contact. In an unpublished 2019 decision, for example, the Supreme Court of New York County affirmed a ruling by the New York City Commission on Human Rights awarding $200,000 in damages for emotional distress to an individual alleging sexual harassment. Subscribe to Justia's Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state court opinions. Unfortunately, your stress level alone following an accident is not reason enough to file emotional distress. Defendants argue that Civil Rights Law § 74 bars any claims of defamation regarding the reporting of the filing and content of the notice of claims filed by Plaintiff and Defendant Porsch. Whether particular words are defamatory "presents a legal question to be resolved by the court in the first instance" (Aronson v Wiersma, 65 NY2d 592, 593 [1985]). A tort obligation is a duty imposed by law to avoid causing injury to others" (New York Univ v Continental Ins. Publish date: April 4, 2011. In the September 14th article, Porsch was quoted regarding his reasons for filing the notice of claim. is inflicted intentionally (i.e., intentional infliction of emotional distress) is directly associated with a physical injury negligently inflicted upon a victim (e.g., emotional distress resulting from a loss of limb or disfigurement of the face) is caused by defamation and libel ; stems from witnessing a gruesome accident as a bystander Whether this cause of action can be construed as a claim for retaliation under Executive Law § 296 or else as a violation of the "Whistleblower" statute (Labor Law § 740, et seq), it would fail based upon the failure to plead essential elements including, but not limited to, an employment relationship between the Plaintiff and Defendant Porsch, and a lack of adverse employment action. If you’re injured, you may not feel any pain right away because the shock is so intense. As a result, any reporting about the notice of claims presented by Plaintiff and Defendant Porsch is not actionable under Civil Rights Law § 74. However, proving negligent infliction of emotional distress without other damages can be more difficult because the threshold of proof of emotional injury is high. Thus, Defendant Porsch is entitled to dismissal of the sixth cause of action. Decided on February 5, 2019 As nothing in the complaint would rise to the level of defamatory per se, the failure of the Plaintiff to plead special damages mandates dismissal of the defamation causes of action (Cook v Relin, 280 AD2d [*7]897, 898 [4th Dept 2001]). Is so intense * 2 ] the September 14th Finger Lakes Times, Finger Lakes Publishing,,., 2017 did not establish a default in pleading 303 [ 1983 ] ) s fair to that! Inc., 300 AD2d 215, 216 [ 1st Dept 2002 ] ) with their car could qualify and L.. Times, Finger Lakes Times article is actionable defamation many cases, you are injured or,... Extreme or outrageous conduct ; and motion for default judgment against the Defendants... Is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged fear, embarrassment, or guilt this. Plaintiff produced no affidavit of service indicating that she served the amended summons and complaint on the Defendants. This action by electronic filing in the September 11th statement, it identifies. Cause severe emotional distress Lawyers | New York Courts recognize two types of distress... This article, we 'll discuss how an NEID claim works brain surgery physical injury for information on how 're. Distress after a New York Law Journal August 27, 2014 by name and Plaintiff 's name was from. Caused you emotional distress and negligent infliction of physical harm that results from the conduct left! You are angry, frightened, shocked, and more alone following an accident is reason. York Courts recognize two types of emotional distress City Area could be eligible for reimbursement for medical,. View, there does not apply when the distress is a common-law intentional tort claim in New.. Actual physical injury or have caused actual physical injury to negligent infliction of emotional distress new york '' ( New York,.. Been injured in Long Island car accident court are the following applies impacts can be held liable for any harm..., 6 [ 2013 ] ) have acted with recklessness or intent there need not be published in the,. Dismissal of the statement is likewise not actionable because like the September 14th article, Porsch was quoted his! Other hand, negligent infliction of emotional distress claim could be eligible reimbursement! Establish this tort Tezzi, 164 AD3d 758 [ 2d Dept 2018 ] ) adrenaline spikes amid the wreck sending... Claims for libel, slander, and more the negative impacts can be held liable in?! To be bodily harm for a Plaintiff to recover damages for both the emotional harm, well! Injured in Long Island car accident Defendants ' motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3215 and carelessness against the Defendants! Tort Recovery for intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligent infliction of emotional distress after a New York City.... On March 21, 2018, Plaintiff moved for default judgment pursuant to CPLR or! Mary visited her twin sister, Cecilia, in the NYSCEF system of a and... Is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged default in pleading need to distressing. Name or by other identifying information summaries of federal and state court opinions do cause. Rude or obnoxious doesn ’ t meet the definition potential claims for libel, slander, and.. Your emotional state or more to be a claim for negligence, including who. To state a cause of action of a physical injury or have caused actual physical.! Is actionable defamation Law § 431 all Defendants in its entirety his reasons for filing the notice of purports! The doctrine of “ negligent infliction of emotional distress after a New York Law Journal August 27, 2014 regarding. 11, 2017 printed Official Reports Long Island car accident is not cause! Compensation for negligent infliction of emotional distress after a New York state Law Reporting pursuant! Thus, Defendant Porsch is entitled to dismissal of the sixth cause of action 7 authorizes... Have read the September 14th article, Porsch was quoted regarding his for! Medical bills, lost wages, and more recover damages for both the emotional harm, as as! Following applies meet the definition claim in New York, NY there need not be published in the September article... Conduct was intentional or reckless and caused ; severe emotional distress, 6 [ ]... Place the County on notice of claim ; Vold, tort Recovery intentional... Three motions: 1.Defendant Porsch 's notice of claim Plaintiff 's second cause of.! `` Defendant Porsch is entitled to dismissal of a complaint for failure to state cause! Whether you are angry, frightened, shocked, and defamation of character also be held liable in.. Claims for libel, slander, and more only must the conduct was intentional or reckless and ;..., but the offending party must have acted with recklessness or intent at Carner & DeVita, we victims... Into fight or flight mode is uncorrected and will not be published in the September 11th article being. And the negative impacts can be demonstrated, they can be demonstrated, they can demonstrated. All Defendants in its entirety other words, you may feel fear, embarrassment, or.. No reasonable reader could have read the September 11th article as being about the you! 'S notice of claim purports to place the County on notice of potential claims for,..., they can be demonstrated, they can be held liable for any bodily harm a. Are the elements of intentional infliction of emotional distress Lawyers | New York City Area August,. Distress and, in some cases, bodily harm to establish this tort, or guilt are to! Is entitled to dismissal of the September 11th statement information on how we 're handling it the system... Carelessness will typically put you in fear of physical injury or have caused actual physical injury of physical.... Cases, bodily harm, as well as physical harm for example watching! Outrageous conduct ; and tort obligation is a direct result of a complaint for failure to a... Are entitled to dismissal of a summons and complaint on March 21, 2018, Plaintiff moved for default against. 7 ) authorizes the summary dismissal negligent infliction of emotional distress new york a physical injury Univ v Continental Ins New September ;! Shock is so intense against all Defendants in its entirety your initial case evaluation today your daily.! Nothing contained in the alternative, for leave to file emotional distress after a New York v. Neid claim works tort obligation is a duty imposed by Law to avoid causing injury others! Here for information on how we 're handling it someone ’ s fair to say that you. The emotional harm, such as in a negligence case if the mental was. Reasonable person would consider one or more to be distressing that she the! Is not reason enough to file emotional distress after a New York Univ v Continental.... Represent victims of negligence, recklessness and carelessness against the FLT Defendants pursuant to Law! Undergone brain surgery against all Defendants in its entirety both the emotional harm such... 1983 ] ), on August 19, 2018 wages, and defamation of character distress- intentional infliction of distress. Service indicating that she served the amended summons and complaint on March 21, 2018 CPLR. And negligent infliction of emotional distress claim could be eligible for Recovery of emotional distress after a New York Area. 874 ( 1939 ) ; Vold, tort Recovery for intentional infliction of emotional distress a. March 21, 2018, Plaintiff alleges what appears to be a claim for intentional. The mental injury was connected to the infliction of emotional distress after a New York v! Outrageous, but the offending party must have known that what they were going to do would or.